

With the agents pouring concrete, we can now focus on the thing as a whole.
This is such a dumb take because it’s wrong in both directions.
Either LLMs are really bad and shouldn’t be trusted to write code and by trusting them you’re going to utterly fail. Or LLMs are actually good enough to write code, but then they’ll also be good enough to design/architect anything you could and reduce your labor’s value to zero (e.g. someone will create a harness that lets the business guys TRULY prompt whatever they want into existence). The only situation where this works out for labor is if LLMs end up frozen in some middle ground where they don’t get any more capable.
This idea that the LLM is analogous to a camera is such an insipid, thought-terminating cliché.
I don’t entirely agree; 200000 questions asked per day is arguably a worse situation than 100 asked per day, and the latter rounds to 0 in that chart.
But yeah it feels pretty dead.