insurrection

“what is different about a pig that makes it less than morally bad to kill the pig?”

oh, the classic rhetorical trap of “name the trait” which always devolves into a no-true-scotsman. on its face it’s purely a spectrum fallacy. the inability to identify a singular trait or even a set of traits that differentiate humans from pigs doesn’t change the fact that they are fundamentally different.

please, no one fall for this line of discussion. it’s just an exercise in shaming and time-wasting.

“it follows logically from your opposition to my post questioning it.”

no, you’re making a leap of logic.

“You obviously think it’s OK to make fun of people for being Vegan”

you can’t cite any evidence for this

unhinged from reality. you have no idea who I am. you are making up your own facts and claiming your thoughts belong to others.

your edit is even more unhinged.

… and you came up with those groups. you could have picked hipsters, librarians, and beer snobs.

you’re the one proposing these topics. this is sociopathic reasoning.

where are the fucking mods

what a gish gallop. you sure you didn’t have any more righteous claims too stack in?

write on mobile and go for speed over accuracy

no one believes you

no. get gud.

I thought you said spam by definition was repeated.

who said anything about a law enforcement agency

“That’s what you said.”

no, it’s not

if it were literally what i was saying, you could link it instead of writing words that i did not (and would not) write.

this is a strawman.

they’re not wrong, at least they’re not any more wrong than utilitarians or divine command theorists.

"“you value your life more than a life of an insect, therefore there are different types of animals, therefore one has all the rights and the others can be tortured and exploited” "

this isn’t what i said. it’s a strawman.

“That’s not what those words in that order mean.”

yea, it is.