

Yeah. That’s why I called it a joke.


Yeah. That’s why I called it a joke.


Tankies are pro-authoritarian communists (on paper), they support communism to such an extent, they forgive the genocides and the horrible practices that enabled some historic regimes, and often even celebrate them. (Mao, Stalin, etc).
For instance, they often posit the Holodomor famine and genocide was justified.
Ignorance and naivete aside, they either have migrated to (or been coopted by) Russian propaganda networks to such an extent that the circles are just overlapping at this point.
The joke is that the political spectrum is a horseshoe, and they went so far left they’re essentially adjacent to the far right. Either way, authoritarians are going to authoritarian.
(inb4 I get brigaded when the russian bot farms come back online)
Ugh, I’m really not getting into this, and I disagree that I’m misrepresenting. I don’t care if it’s your views or you’re just stating tankie views, it’s incorrect regardless. This is my last reply.
I will agree it’s contested whether it was a genocide or not, but I’m not aware of any respected viewpoint that puts the Kulaks at any kind of fault. Claiming they had a hand in it is bullshit propaganda.
They were the target of a literal “liquidation campaign” at Stalin’s hand. Forcing a population that has owned and farmed land for generations to choose between collecitvised agriculture or death is monsterous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization
He killed entire generational populations, fathers, women, children, because they resisted communism. That’s monstrous. That’s why tankies are monstrous. And the result of his direct action was a famine that killed 5-8 million people.
And to preempt a retort of “they were wealthy abuuuusers of common folk”: