

they will anyways. first person that gets found lying or disables it, they target the distro.
the law was written to make compliance the metric for dissidence. all “users” are minors. identities flagged as not a minor is a lie, as users cannot be minors only “account holders”.
it’s not written to support the Linux ecosystem. it’s specifically worded to exclude and target the Linux ecosystem if it tries to comply without using meta/google/Microsoft to handle accounts.







the law wouldn’t hold up in court anyway. its not practical for any ecosystem outside online sites.
accounts and users are the same thing, despite what the law says. it also doesn’t different a person from a user, meaning a compromised system that is complying with the law, its actions represent the user, and the account holder is held responsible.
its made to absolve meta/Microsoft/google from their actions in targeting kids with intentionally addictive content and making the “account holder” at fault.