Alternatively, people who want windows decide to order the Linux config, and use the $280 they saved to buy an OEM windows license elsewhere (or like, just pirate it)
These don’t fall under section 10 though - 7A through F detail the terms that are explicitly exempt from the restriction on adding additional terms.
Other people have argued that these are contradictory - but you don’t need trademark rights to display a logo if the purpose of the display is to directly refer to the trademarked material. They are likely hoping for something along the lines of “powered by <onlyoffice logo>”. For example, Coca Cola logos and trademarks have appeared in TONS of Pepsi marketing materials, because those trademarks were used to directly refer to the coca cola brand, which is fair use.
I think what it comes down to is whether the courts see “displaying the logo” as “reasonable” attribution or not.
7b of the AGPL specifically allows additional terms to be added to the license as it pertains to preserving attribution or legal notices.
The AGPL license allows the license holder to specify additional terms of the license that require preservation of specified reasonable attributions or legal notices - this is covered in 7B, and the onlyoffice license specifies that the logo must be preserved for attribution.
Assuming a logo legally counts as reasonable attribution (IANAL) that would put only office in the right here, but holy shit, the fact that the license allows these modifications to be put on line #655 rather than line #2 is absurd. I, like most people I assume, only read far enough into the license to figure out whether it’s MIT or GPL
This explanation is a really terrible explanation - it doesn’t even explain the point of the study or what multiple comparisons are in statistics…
This is what the salmon study was saying - if you did a whole brain analysis with fmri without an a priori prediction you need to adopt a radically more stringent threshold for significance
The salmon in the MRI was a bowl with a million jellybeans in it
It’s not a valid control unless you adjust for ivermectin consumption
I only took a cursory glance but a lot of that belongs to the UI framework (svelte)
Similar to react/vue, it’s used to render the content on the page, and automatically update what’s shown on the page when variables change value. This basically replaced jquery and the callback-hell that was mid-2000s web development
I would love to see the breakdown by source, the national post is owned by a Republican billionaire so there’s a big asterisk when calling it “Canadian Media”
As per the article, knowing when the tool is reading totally unrelated files allows devs to cancel the workflow early before it churns thousands of tokens on output that is based on totally incorrect information
Internationally where English is understood
in the coming decades
Given that in the past 15 years we went from “solving regression problems a little bit better than linear models some of the time” to what we have now, it’s not unfounded to think 15 years from now people could be giving LLMs access to code execution environments
This happened on an episode of Maury - my roommate and I were convinced the father was an idiot for claiming one of his twins wasn’t his, and then the paternity test came back and we lost our minds