you don’t know to use AI. no one here does. I do.
That’s hilarious. Everyone thinks they’re some kind of savant while using LLMs. The reality is quite different
AI is a useful tool, but people who misuse it, primarily due to overreliance, end up creating more work than AI is solving
It’s a coalition of groups with different purposes
One group wants to ban porn entirely
One group want to collect data on everyone. Your porn habits can be valuable if you’re a future political rival
Some people believe it will prevent children from seeing porn
Others use it as a way to assert control over sex workers, especially female sex workers
Probably a few other smaller groups too. End of the day, none of them have your interests at heart
Don’t worry, Trump is pardoning drug traffickers as long as they can pay for it
This kind of thing is why she loat an election to Donald Trump of all people. She had the easiest race in history, but failed because she is a deeply unlikable shill
You’re assuming what they’re saying is true. Many other countries have those same safety features without their cars costing nearly as much
Just had a bit of a realization on this one. The point of this is for them to do nothing, isn’t it? Specifically blame it one something people will push back on (safety features), so they can throw up their hands and say, “we tried, but they won’t let us bring down the cost of cars!”
Why is that an important detail? Does itbmakeba functional difference to me as a user? OpenAI collected the data and failed to secure it. Doesn’t matter if a 3rd party was involved
Cars aren’t nearly as expensive in the rest of the world, and many countries are including those safety features and more
The US domestic auto market is propped up by protectionist economic policies. Fairly universal than when a market doesn’t have to compete, their prices go up
It’s so poorly written. A document like that is an important legal document, but it reads like it was written by an undergrad
Just embarrassing for the US to put out a document like that
If that were the case I’d have spent thousands on Linux by now T.T
He’s not vying for customers. He’s sucking up to Trump in the hopes of getting preferential treatment for his company
We’ve seen over and over again, companies that praise him, or bribe him, are getting business advantages from the Trump administration
Technically correct, but media never uses it that way. People generally do not differentiate the two
The fact she is making this distinction, which she has never made before for anyone, tells me she’s priming her audience to be okay with rich and powerful men raping underage women
Which part? Can you be more specific as to what you mean?
Hot take: Rural drivers shouldn’t get a say in how urban roads are designed
It’s not their city. They don’t live in it. They can stay in their town if they don’t like it
At this point most people just throw pennies away. At best they’re being saved in a change jar to be brought to the bank. Almost no one is using pennies for payment of goods and services. It’s a useless waste of money to produce and congress should have gotten rid of them decades ago
The only issue here is that it isn’t congress getting rid of it. It’s the president taking power from congress to get rid of it
You’re missing the point because they didn’t use precise language
Congress establishes what coins and bills are to be minted. The executive branch executes that directive. Congress has directed the executive branch to mint pennies. The executive branch determined 0 is a number of pennies to mint. The Mint is not minting pennies, despite congress directing them to do so
If the president is allowed to interpret laws congress passes so broadly, it gives an incredible amount of power to the executive branch. Historically, the president hasn’t been given nearly that level of authority
It’s illegal because congress said to mint pennies, but the executive branch is not minting pennies
Someone else mentioned children waiting for the bus get run over at a much higher rate if it’s dark early in the morning, which is a pretty valid argument
That being said, I’d much rather it get dark later in the day
50 cent piece would be the way to go. Should then also really push $1 coins, and add in a $2 and $5 coin, although I don’t know if Americans would realistically use them. Coins are much more durable than paper currency though, which would save a lot of money long term
Canada was a decade ahead of the US when it came to implementing tap. It’ll take the US a long while to get to the same level of universal acceptance, starting from so far behind
Do less drugs.