

I’m sure the oppression, including bombings that take civilian lives has been going on for a while. Genocide has a different definition so that’s simply not true.
IDGAF about what you say about your shitty news source. I’m gonna trust it as much as I’m gonna trust MAGA.com on anything about the democrats. And I’m not in the US either. Not all media is as biased as you think in Europe. I’m sure Jerusalem has long arms but they don’t control all media.
My statement is not bold at all. It is simple truth and also simply a matter of chance (with your user name I think that may appeal to you).
If a bomb lands on a terrorist’s car, that’s not genocide. Some bombs still land on terrorists. And as always, terrorists who choose kill innocent kids because their parents oppress their people can fuck off and die a horrible death.

I think trying to bend the definition to make it fit the word isn’t worth discussing: it’s all semantics. We both know what has been happening.
And you can’t make a blanket statement about “all media” based on the few you have seen in one country with a heavily biased view.
I’m less emotional and more pragmatic. I try to stick to whatever facts we do know and not make assumptions that are more based on my feelings than on reality. That does mean “we” don’t know a lot of the terrible stuff that is going on, and that does mean ignoring some sources if they seem heavily biased. Even though there may be some truth in what they’re reporting, it will always be worse than a credible fact-driven (and not emotion-driven) news source.