I know several people who are in arranged marriages, and while they are happy enough with the situation, all of them have very clearly said they will never do this to their children, so take from that what you will.

Introduction is common enough I’d say, but any expectation beyond maybe talking to them is not.

As for what most people do: it’s just going about life and meeting people. Join clubs, talk to people in your community, at work or school, friends of friends (or family friends, again introducing is common enough, anything beyond that isn’t), even bars works; anywhere really.

Just don’t go places to find a partner; go to places to meet people. From there meet the ones you like more often, make friends, and over time you’ll bump into people and find the right ones. This is one of those things that happens more the less you “try”. Be open to the idea, but let people get to know you as a friend first.

Longer is always better, but a fully random password will always be stronger than a “memorable” password of equal length.

You need exactly one memorable password, and that should be the one to your password manager, maybe two if you need to log into your device first. From there everything else should be long and random. Hell, with most of them you don’t ever even need to know your own passwords, the tool just handles them itself.

XKCD has it right that you need length over complexity, but it’s also from 2011. Today, we very easily can and should get both.

Passwords should be like bad experiences.

The more you remember the worse they were.

Agreed, I use AI for coding the way I used to use Stack Overflow:

Find me code examples, explain an error or give me some summaries of how something should work but then I go confirm that or test it separately!

I never trusted Stack Overflow for anything more than pointing me in the right direction for what to research. Documentation links, snippets, blogs etc, that sort of stuff. As long as I tell the AI to give me a reference, about 60-70% of the time I’ll get something I can actually use to confirm the code it gave me or get an answer for my question. At best what it does is save me googling time.

Hmm. Well, most chemical desiccants would probably cause moderate to severe damage when breathed in, and with a bit of suspense of disbelief could explain developmental issues…

I don’t have hard evidence for this (might try and find some at some point though), but I feel like outages have become progressively more common in the last 4-5ish years.

Feels like every time the AI tools “get better” there’s an increase and no one gives a shit. Like, what the fuck? When did stability and reliability become so irrelevant to people?

Hell, GitHub might as well just close up shop with the amount of outages it’s had recently! I get that the bubble is a bubble but how has AI not cost companies enough in outages to show it’s a waste???

Naaaaa, Na Na, Nanana Naaaaaaa, Nanana Naaaaaaa, Naaa Naaa…

If you have the right relationship for it, ask him about the porn he watches, his banking details and how much money he’s got in his account, and tell him you’ll go buy a billboard to put those on.

Those usually get people quite quickly, but they’re also kind of “gotcha!” moments, and people will generally not respond well to them.

If you want a more structured argument, I think you’ll need to reframe the issue. As I read your comment (I’m almost certainly missing huge amounts of context that could change this answer drastically) your father’s argument is “privacy is bad because it is only used for bad things” and you’re actually arguing back “privacy is good because I want to be left alone”. But your dad thinks that you shouldn’t be left alone, because being left alone means you’re doing something bad.

So, don’t argue why privacy is good, you need to argue why privacy isn’t bad. Find some examples of things he likes that only happened because of privacy. Try to avoid things like revolutions, resistance movements or stuff like that, because it will only reaffirm his view that privacy means you’re doing something bad/anti establishment.

This is where the aforementioned porn/finances comes in, since those are usually things people want to keep private, without having negatives attached (depends a bit with porn on morals). Any guilty pleasures that come into mind would also be useful for this.

Also, make the consequences of no privacy more personal. Government whatever, but what about Janet two doors down? What about his boss? What about his parents?

In the end I’d say it’s all about the framing of why privacy matters in the first place. Establish a minimum need for privacy, then expand from there. Hope this helps you (or someone else)!