Dude he specifically used the word “gang-raped” not “mild groping” or “gawking”. I don’t think it’s far-fetched to assume those cops are now behind bars for GANG-RAPING someone

I had a dear friend who was gang raped by sheriff’s deputies.

Unless this happened in a third world country, i reckon those cops would be in jail by now.

Condolences to your friend

Gonna have to provide some statistics buddy. This is just polemics from you

Availability heuristic. You don’t hear about the thousands more peaceful altercations. The only ones you hear about are the violent ones which, surprise surprise, are more likely to get shown in the media

Yes, let the self-interested capitalists dictate gun policy. That’s surely a recipe for prosperity

Sycophantino the fucking turd!

No, but go off

W reporting

Same old same old

SYBAU

That’s kinda not his problem though

Wdym by here? Where you live?

Also, what problems would we have with communism?

My socialism sensors are tingling

It is what it is. The world is arguably better with them than without

Deepseek here i come

BOYCOTT CAPITALISM

You don’t even attempt to rebut the theories. Just slinging around insults. You’re just a troll i guess

Your position has changed many times throughout our discussion, from faulty use of Fisher’s theory, to raving about dominance hierarchies and now you’ve settled on “the theory is outdated”.

The theory is not in fact outdated because it’s based on historical materialism which is widely accepted among academics and has proven itself to be true. In fact dialectical materialism was extrapolated to form the basis of the conflict theory which many sociologists use to explain ‘why’ and ‘how’ conflicts develop in society, like between different races, the patriarchy etc.

There’s an argument to be made that the economic system that is “socialism” is outdated, but that’s another argument; the philosophy underlying it however is not. Every Marxist whether anarchist, Leninist, syndicalist and so on agrees that capitalism will end; everyone’s just arguing about whose type it’s going to be.

Any form of socialism is not feasible without human consciousness evolving into some kind of singularity

Bruh what😂.That’s just not true. The workers only need to be class conscious. That means they need to realise that they’re oppressed and must revolt. That’s all that is necessary. We’ve gotten close many times, but those opportunities have been squandered. Once again, i refer you to the Occupy Wall Street movement which started to put capitalism back into the minds of the working class.

by claiming the proletariat would dominate the bourgeois. If socialism is about the worker owning the means of production, there is no bourgeois class, except for the worker.

The bourgeoisie would be in a constant bid to reinstate itself throughout socialism. This fight not only exists within the state’s own borders, but outside of it. This is the main fight. That is what is meant by this. I don’t have quotes on hand, but I can find you specific Marx quotes if you’re adamant about it.

Mate your ignorance is glaring here. There are many socialisms. There’s Marxism-Leninism which warrants a vanguard, there’s anarchism which believes in decentralisation, there’s democratic confederalism which is a fusion of the state and decentralisation. You’re so ignorant it’s not even slapstick.

This is why you’re not intelligent. You’re wrong, but some dogma is holding you back and i don’t know what it is.