- 28 Posts
- 5 Comments
Bro666@lemmy.kde.socialMto
KDE@lemmy.kde.social•A polite open letter to KDE developers and maintainers, which got blocked by a moderator.
1·29 days agoYou should probably not take the opinion of one developer as the official position of the whole of KDE. KDE has not got an official position on this topic yet because there is still too much up in the air: are these laws going to stick? Will there be a loophole or exemption for FLOSS? Will it be possible of have the thing disabled be default and just be there for product manufacturers to activate in their products sold in the affected regions? Will it even fall to the devs of desktop projects to like ours to implement this? Will it matter at all or is this all just theatre and the user can just input anything, say, 01/01/1901, and be done with it?
And, probably most important of all: Will KDE as a community comply? This is not up to one developer. There is usually lot of discussion, often a vote. There are lot of different nationalities and people with diverse opinions. Just because one contributor has expressed an opinion, does not a done deal make.
Bro666@lemmy.kde.socialMto
KDE@lemmy.kde.social•A polite open letter to KDE developers and maintainers, which got blocked by a moderator.
1·29 days agoBut where is this letter coming from? Did kde implement the age verification?
No.
I haven’t seen any confirmation about it.
It hasn’t even been considered.
Bro666@lemmy.kde.socialMto
KDE@lemmy.kde.social•A polite open letter to KDE developers and maintainers, which got blocked by a moderator.
1·29 days agoI think developers can do something about it. They don’t want to, maybe for obvious reasons, and I respect their choice.
Can you point me to the… what? Survey? you are getting this information from? What are we talking here? 90%+ of all FLOSS developers?
I ask because it is usually quite hard to get FLOSS developers to all agree on anything. I am surprised you got a monolithic response to such a controversial topic.
Bro666@lemmy.kde.socialMto
KDE@lemmy.kde.social•A polite open letter to KDE developers and maintainers, which got blocked by a moderator.
21·29 days agoI’m sorry you feel this way, but again you are barking up the wrong tree as we can’t do anything about it… except what you can do too: protest to the people who want to impose this upon us.
Bringing this issue up here or on Discuss is pointless: We know, we are aware, we are against it, we don’t want it, we realise there are ulterior motives from corrupt actors, and we will do what we can to oppose them.
But this, posting to Discuss, complaining about KDE being indifferent here (which it isn’t) is probably the most unproductive thing you could do. You are tying up resources of volunteers who are already on your side. Like you say organising a protest, writing to the powers-that-be, educating your local/state/national representative, all these thing help.
But this is just consuming volunteers’ time up in moderating a potential flamewar on a topic that we (and I would argue everybody else here) already knows about.








Thank me later.