• Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    $159,974,600 in “Salaries, wages, and related fringe benefits” for 2025.

    Why would a nonprofit company that supplies databases of library metadata need to pay $160 million dollars to staff? You can run a midsized business for that. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/annual-report/2025/pdf/2025_OCLC_Audit_Report.pdf

    2024 executive earnings: https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/310734115

    Key Employees and Officers Compensation

    Prichard David (President & Ceo) $1,347,322

    Rozek William (Cfo, Treasurer) $832,584

    Murphy Bart (Chief Tech. & Info. Officer) $765,667

    Leeches.

    • whoever loves Digit 🇵🇸🇺🇸🏴‍☠️@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They serve 30,000+ libraries in 100+ countries according to Wikipedia, sounds like it might involve a lot of staff

      They might be leeches but on the other hand you might be underestimating how much work goes into trying to keep library databases accurate

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I thought that was the point of non profits, you gotta funnel money to the people running it or you get looked at like a failure by the other oligarchs.

      • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can’t comprehend why the highest executive at one of these places would get paid more than 250k. It’s a nonprofit in fucking ohio, MCOL in cities at best, LCOL in huge swaths of the state.

        They wield tremendous power. Nonprofits should not be tools for oligarchs to shelter assets and defraud the public, but they are all over the US and probably the world.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because that’s the going rate for CEOs. Any of them could go to some private corporation and make just as much, if not more. So, nonprofits have to pay competitively or only afford CEOs willing to take the pay cut.

          Which is all really terrible because no CEO is worth that much. They only get paid that much because big corporations have absurd amounts of money, and the people in charge of setting salaries have no restriction on paying themselves that much.

          • whoever loves Digit 🇵🇸🇺🇸🏴‍☠️@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Any of them could go to some private corporation and make just as much, if not more. So, nonprofits have to pay competitively or only afford CEOs willing to take the pay cut.

            How is that a problem?

            Why not hire someone like me instead of someone that wants capitalist omnicide?

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              We live in a Capitalist world, and like it or not, those CEOs know how to make companies thrive in it.

              That’s the idea, at least.

        • whoever loves Digit 🇵🇸🇺🇸🏴‍☠️@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          To me the real reason it’s a red flag is that nonprofit staff are supposed to file income taxes, and those taxes have funded the Iraq invasion and Guantanamo Bay and starvation in Gaza and subsidies for the oil industry and shit, but there are other ways to divert that money through the nonprofit with tax exemption.

          So if I was the CEO of that nonprofit why tf would I ever take a big salary when I actually want to help the world survive, not ruin it like some corporate asshole?

          Seems like a signal that someone like me isn’t allowed to be CEO of a nonprofit like that because I’ve done everything I can to avoid paying these warlord taxes instead of being part of some rich people money laundering club