• Lysergid@lemmy.mlEnglish
    2·
    1 month ago

    Entire intelligence agencies will try to hack into your communications to ensure that cat does not resembles supreme commander. At the same time ignoring that dude which paid 5 bucks in taxes, has private island and absolutely not sus traffic from all over the world.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      30 days ago

      They had hard evidence of the Epstein classes crimes for DECADES.

      At this point it should be self evident that the global intelligence community — likely including the agencies responsible for CSAM — are corrupt to their core and all compromised by the Epstein class of lawless billionaire psychopaths. It’s highly likely Epstein and Trump’s entire pedo sex trafficking ring was created by American/Israeli intelligence orgs to extort and blackmail globally, considering Ghislaine Maxwells dad was so high up that every living Israeli PM attended his funeral; some giving speeches alluding to his espionage.

      Just like the police, these secret police exist to protect and defend capital. Capital IS “national security”. They don’t give a shit about laws, morality, democracy, or any of the other virtue signals Hollywood et al perpetuate. If they did, they wouldn’t have ignored the evidence about hundreds of billionaire pedophiles, for DECADES.

  • skisnow@lemmy.caEnglish
    1·
    30 days ago

    Mitch Webber’s original email to him was essentially “yeah you’re golden, fuck as many minors as you like, just bring them to another state first”. And he still seems to have kept his job at (checks notes) an antisemitism group.

    …what would happen if one were to transport a minor for sex — or transport oneself with the intent to have sex with a minor — into a state in which the age of consent is below eighteen (assuming the minor is above the age of consent in the given state)? And your intuition was right. The answer is that there is no violation of law.”

    Let’s be clear: everyone has a right to be represented by a lawyer in court, and we shouldn’t judge lawyers for defending rapists because they’re literally their job. But that’s not what’s happening here; this is him actively helping Epstein figure out the best way to rape children.

    https://jewishpostandnews.ca/uncategorized/antisemitism-group-keeps-board-member-who-emailed-epstein-on-the-legality-of-transporting-minors-for-sex/

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      30 days ago

      he still seems to have kept his job at (checks notes) an antisemitism group.

      to be clear, this is a group for prevention of antisemitism and not a group who aims to be antisemitic, right?

          • rumba@lemmy.zipEnglish
            0·
            30 days ago

            innocent jews still exist.

            Absolutely, and I’d say even the majority. Sadly, the non-innocent ones have just devalued the definition of antisemitism so harshly that it cannot be used anymore without the assumption of bad connotation. I would recommend coming up with a new, more specific term that can’t be used as a genocide shield.

            • hector@lemmy.todayEnglish
              1·
              30 days ago

              Indeed, and the word doesn’t fit anyway. Arabs are a semetic peoples. Bigotry takes many forms, but idk if hating a country’s actions would fit into any of them in an honest definition. It’s not xenophobia to oppose the actions of a government, I don’t know what type of bigotry would even be close.

              Because opposing official actions of a country, is not bigotry. Opposing the actions of a people, is not bigotry under any reasonable definition unless you are opposing it because of whom they are.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.caEnglish
    1·
    29 days ago

    Sure, but you’re not an agent of the state and are more likely to be arrested for your cat videos than Epstein was about pedophilia.

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      29 days ago

      Or rather the feds that are reading data on these email servers are on their side so they have nothing to fear.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    30 days ago

    This looks more like he’s discussing defenses to his case with his lawyer.

    Look at the e-mail that Epstein replied to, it seems to be specifically related to discussing his case. This appears to be from his lawyer

    <a bunch of discussion about hypothetical situations and the associated laws>

    Remember, though, that sex trafficking is inapplicable in your case. As I wrote in my August 11 memo, "In Epstein’s case, (1) he never transported any girl across state lines, and (2) he never traveled with the intent of soliciting prostitution from underage girls. (Because section 2423(b) is essentially an ‘attempt’ statute, it requires specific intent of wrongdoing. See, e.g., United States v. Sims, 428 F.3d 945, 959-60 (10th Cir. 2005).)

    Then the e-mail in the OP is sent.

    It’s gross, but my initial reading was that he’s creating a plan to travel and is trying to dodge laws. However, in reading the full context, it seems more like they’re talking about his cases.

    e: as discovered below, this e-mail is from August 2006, he was arrested 1 month before this, so this e-mail is almost certainly about his case and not about trying to find loopholes to do more crimes.

  • arc99@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    30 days ago

    The fact that all these communications were pulled from GMail and presumably known to law enforcement for years shows its not signal.

  • Homosexual sapiens@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    0·
    30 days ago

    Is the boot partition on a separate drive because the unencrypted partition would somehow reveal information about the drive that could be used to analyze the encrypted portions?

    • nao@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      29 days ago

      Someone could install something on the unencrypted boot partition to leak the key next time it gets used

      • Homosexual sapiens@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        0·
        29 days ago

        Would this not apply even if the unencrypted boot partition is on another physical drive? You still have to enter the passphrase into the prompt at boot. Wouldn’t a compromised boot partition be able to access the passphrase in memory at that time, and use that to access the key?

        • nao@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          29 days ago

          It would, but I assumed the idea was to have the external drive with you at all times so no one could tamper with it. Otherwise I don’t see the benefit, a permanently connected external drive may as well be internal.