very_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square138linkfedilinkarrow-up1131arrow-down11cross-posted to: neoluddites@lemmy.todaygoodnewseveryone@piefed.socialStopTech@lemmy.todayfuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1130arrow-down1external-linkDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comvery_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square138linkfedilinkcross-posted to: neoluddites@lemmy.todaygoodnewseveryone@piefed.socialStopTech@lemmy.todayfuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squarethegoodyinthehoody@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·4 months agoAs much as I agree with this poll, duck duck go is a very self selecting audience. The number doesn’t actually mean much statistically. If the general public knew that “AI” is much closer to predictive text than intelligence they might be more wary of it
minus-squareslappyfuck@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 months agoThere was no implication that this was a general poll designed to demonstrate the general public’s attitudes. I’m not sure why you mentioned this.
minus-squareLightfire228@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·4 months agoBecause that’s how most people implicitly frame headlines like this one: a generalization of the public
As much as I agree with this poll, duck duck go is a very self selecting audience. The number doesn’t actually mean much statistically.
If the general public knew that “AI” is much closer to predictive text than intelligence they might be more wary of it
There was no implication that this was a general poll designed to demonstrate the general public’s attitudes. I’m not sure why you mentioned this.
Because that’s how most people implicitly frame headlines like this one: a generalization of the public