• MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      At that point the genetic difference would be too small to not call that bird some sort of chicken.

      • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nope.

        There will be an exact egg that contains the first chicken (defined as an animal that can fuck other chickens and produce offspring IIRC), that came before the first chicken because the chicken was in the egg.

        • MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m no biologist, but I’m pretty sure this ignores how fluid the evolution is from regular bird to proto-chicken to chicken.

          • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not really there is a well defined line that defines what is/isn’t a chicken, that’s really the only thing needed for this question.

            The issue is the term proto-chicken isn’t well defined.

            But for it to be considered a different species it would have to not be able to reproduce with a modern chicken (which doesn’t mean it can’t reproduce with early chickens).

            • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              there is a well defined line that defines what is/isn’t a chicken

              You’ll have no problem citing the exact definition then.