Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoTavern’s Closedcdn.nord.pubimagemessage-square64linkfedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down126file-text
arrow-up1621arrow-down1imageTavern’s Closedcdn.nord.pubSir. Haxalot@nord.pub to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square64linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI’m not sure what you’re saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus’s blood. Right? When I have had jesus’s blood, it had alcohol in it. So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.
minus-squareZoot@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoA sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.
minus-squareZoot@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoFor instance, any time I had jesus’s blood when I was a catholic, it was always a nice grape flavor.
I’m not sure what you’re saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus’s blood. Right?
When I have had jesus’s blood, it had alcohol in it.
So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.
A sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.
For instance, any time I had jesus’s blood when I was a catholic, it was always a nice grape flavor.