• PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    I speak on behalf of all the people out there that would indeed have trouble reading it, as they didn’t even reference the simple concept of a map, where such studies originated in the first place.

    Because it’s a research paper, not a textbook on graph theory.

    They exclusively use complicated terms like ‘planar graph’

    A planar graph is (loosely) a graph that can be drawn on a single sheet of paper without intersecting the branches. Not very complicated. More importantly, you can find these definitions in any graph theory textbook.

    If you would like to read a textbook on graph theory, I highly recommend A First Course on Graph Theory by Gary Chartrand and Ping Zhang. It’s a Dover book (cheap), and it’s available on LibGen. You will notice that their textbook is printed in black and white, yet their explanation of the Coloring Problem is quite crisp regardless.

    Sometimes simple minded people like to learn as well, so why no reference to a simple map?

    Because people who have no background in graph theory are simply not the audience for this paper.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Wait, you can find textbooks these days that haven’t been burned in favor of digital subscriptions?

      • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Unironically yes.

        So when I did my undergraduate math courses…yeah, those books and assignments were locked behind digital subscriptions, so I cannot access them anymore. I think the reason is that these systems do automatic grading of homework, so they don’t have to hire as many graders. And then for the books, they probably (correctly) assume they’re on LibGen or at the library. where they won’t need to use the ma

        But advanced undergraduate and graduate level books can usually be bought like ordinary books…or borrowed from a shadow library (make sure you’re running uBlock Origin).

        In fact, some authors even give out their books for free, and most authors are willing to send you an electronic copy if you ask. Authors make exactly $0 per sale.

          • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            Are you stupid or something?

            Nah you Dunning-Kruger ass buffoon, I was trying to be helpful, in particular to show people who don’t know shit about graph theory that it is no longer inaccessible knowledge. You clearly need to reread whatever graph theory book you have if you seriously think that planar graphs need to be explained in a research paper or that the Coloring Problem needs to be illustrated with literal colors.

            Also, you said you’re familiar with topology. Topology and graph theory are related but distinct subjects! In topological graph theory, the topology is an additional structure imposed upon a graph. So knowledge about topology is mostly irrelevant for graph theory, except for topological graph theory results.

            • over_clox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              29 days ago

              Render me a torus, I did that at age 17.

              I can simplify my algorithm to less than 2 pages of text, without having to get ridiculous complicated about it.

              • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                29 days ago

                Because it’s a completely different algorithm. Intuitively: graph theory algorithms can get very complicated because you work with very large but finite objects, so combinational algorithms enter the party.

            • over_clox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              29 days ago

              Ok. And I’m still trying to convince people to stop taping magnets on the back of their phones, but they treat me like shit, as if I don’t know what a fucking compass sensor is…

              • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                29 days ago

                but they treat me like shit, as if I don’t know what a fucking compass sensor is…

                I’m sorry that’s happening to you, but that’s completely irrelevant. The book I recommended predates AI, so it cannot be AI slop.

                • over_clox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  I never said a compass sensor was even an AI sensor.

                  Please learn to read before responding, magnets 100% fuck up compass sensors, AI or not.

                  Learn to read a fucking book, you claim to be smart, you should know how a fucking compass works.

                  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    29 days ago

                    I am literally an electrical engineering PhD student. I literally took a course on sensors last year. I know how compasses work. I did not mean to imply that compass sensors are AI sensors (whatever that means).

                    I’m acknowledging that your experience of people being mean to you for being right, while frustrating, is irrelevant to draw any conclusions about the book I recommended.