• over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Why the gatekeeping of the nature of mathematical writing then? Writing about a 4 color system, yet across 96 pages, not a single page even uses 4 colors?

    They actually did bother to make graphs, but not a single page even demonstrates 4 colors on any page simultaneously?

    Come on, there should be better standards than that these days…

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      I’ve already explained to you why every professional discipline uses domain specific terminology. I get the impression this is the first time you’ve seen a scientific paper in your entire life. Why would they bother make a graph of 4 colors on a page, what the fuck would that even illustrate? The 4 color theorem itself isn’t what’s being discussed. It’s the algorithm that’s novel. You just have to accept the fact that this is serious research, and you’re not the target audience for it.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        The algorithm can’t be discussed along with at least a few planar graphs in full color?

        I never said anything against their studies, just their publication. They could have easily rounded that up to 100 pages with 4 extra pages in full color.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          Can you explain how these planar graphs in full color help make the algorithm more clear? Please do elaborate on what additional explanatory power these would add.

          • over_clox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            If you study color, you don’t go at it colorblind.

            Why are you defending the lack of full 4 color graphs, along with the 96 pages of text and math?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              23 days ago

              As I’ve already explained, and you promptly ignored, the paper isn’t about studying color. It’s about a specific mathematical algorithm that solves the theorem in linear time. The 96 page paper is about the algorithm. What part of that are you still struggling to comprehend?

              • over_clox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                23 days ago

                I solve Rubik’s Cubes blindfolded behind my back. Yay for me right? No joke either.

                Still, there’s no reason that mathematical experts can’t come up with an intuitive visual representation of their works.

                I followed the works of Steven Wittens, aka Wacko…

                https://acko.net/

                He actually visualizes mathematics.

                • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  Because sometimes there is no intuitive visualization, or the visualization may even be deceptive. E.g. … the Coloring Problem is not literally about colors. It’s not even about maps. It’s about the abstraction itself. It’s about the math.

                  • over_clox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    23 days ago

                    RGBXY

                    You got a 5 dimensional system right there.

                    Its not that hard, except for the people that don’t understand multiple dimensions…