By good faith you mean believing in what you believe in otherwise it’s not good faith? Pathetic.
Anyone who simps for a country who allows billionaires to exist is not an actual communist. They are a capitalist in a red hat who just hates the west.
No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you’d end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we’d give you.
I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are.
That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you.
Why? I don’t like talking to brick walls or being commanded to do things. That doesn’t my opinions are wrong. But we both know you’re not capable of considering another opinion… in good faith.
If you cant summarize it you dont know the article, if you can’t refute it then your opinion doesn’t matter. One of the core aspects of Marxism is that your opinions change constantly over time (dialectics), it’s just that your points are incorrect and you can’t support them.
I don’t click links. Any country that allows billionaires to exist is not a communist country.
So you’re not talking in good faith, thanks for confirming it
By good faith you mean believing in what you believe in otherwise it’s not good faith? Pathetic.
Anyone who simps for a country who allows billionaires to exist is not an actual communist. They are a capitalist in a red hat who just hates the west.
No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you’d end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we’d give you.
I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are.
That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you.
Summarize the article then and refute it.
Why? I don’t like talking to brick walls or being commanded to do things. That doesn’t my opinions are wrong. But we both know you’re not capable of considering another opinion… in good faith.
If you cant summarize it you dont know the article, if you can’t refute it then your opinion doesn’t matter. One of the core aspects of Marxism is that your opinions change constantly over time (dialectics), it’s just that your points are incorrect and you can’t support them.
Well, thanks for demonstrating for everyone why vibes are no substitute for theory.
It’s so funny when someone just says what you’ve accused them of back to you with no foresight or understanding of what it even means.