• psivchaz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe I’m oversimplifying but I tend to think money is the problem. Supposing all wealth were equally distributed, libertarianism makes a lot of sense to me as maximizing personal freedoms. It generally becomes a problem when people use wealth to abuse others, either by hoarding wealth and restricting the freedom of others that way, or by using inequality to purchase things that no person should be able to purchase.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      These thought experiments are fun and truthful and all but I really dont see much value in this speculation tbh. In my 40something years in different cultures I’ve became a staunch believer in Golden Mean of politics. Use the right tool for the right job. Times are good - work on more fteedoms, times are harder - maybe it’s time to tighten up the belts.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what if the hard times are caused by rich people abusing the commons? Should we just keep tightening our belts while the rich take more and more?

        I agree in general, like if there’s a drought expect less food. But most of our scarcity is artificial. I believe there are solutions to the challenge of surviving.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No the golden mean also applies to your example too. If rich get too toxic it’s time to bring out guillotines