Just two weeks til’ Halloween now.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • Architeuthis@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Decent monday morning take from robert evans:

    Schrodinger’s double-think.

    transcription

    Quote skeet:

    This is a researcher at Anthropic. Some of these people have lost their minds! What is mainlining Claude all day doing to them?

    there are basically two possible futures at this point. either we’re all going to die of[sic] the future is going to be Good beyond our wildest imagination. the trick is to hold this duality in your head and not be driven insane by one side.

    Robert Evans (the only Robert Evans):

    some of these people get so locked into a labyrinth of Rationalist thought experiments that they are no longer really capable of interacting with reality 1/2

    you can in fact limit the horizons of possibility in your own mind so severely that you are no longer able to “think” in a useful way 2/2

    • schnoopy@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, we are all going to die. So… musing over?

      We all get that right, everyone is going to die. Everything living you lay eyes on is going to die. I am 100% certain that the future contains the death of everyone alive today.

      Do they mean immanently? Why?

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They’re referencing the meme that an uncontrolled AI will inevitably kill every last human being, for reasons.

        • schnoopy@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t have to be thrilled about death to have a basic understanding of how basic our understanding of consciousness, biology, and neurology are. Nor to know how much the physical world resists making tiny machines and measurements necessary to explore these frontiers, or the ethical dilemmas involved in exploring how consciousness works that vastly slow and perhaps outright prevent answering questions like “can we replace little bits of someone with some machine we can maintain easier in the interest of prolonging them?”

          Also I do happen to know how the universe ends.

          • BioMan@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 minutes ago

            I have been forced to on multiple occasions explain to people that there is a difference between thinking that there’s anything at all intrinsically good about the fact that things like us that have come about the way we have come with expiration dates, and dealing with it.

          • scruiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t have to be thrilled about death to have a basic understanding of how basic our understanding of consciousness, biology, and neurology are.

            I think its the mid-wit meme, lesswrongers know just enough to imagine some grand solution like brain uploading or nanobots might cure death and not enough to appreciate all the reasons each of those solutions won’t work.

            • schnoopy@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              One of the funniest things I ever read was a result of a survey of laypeople, physics UGs, physics Grads, postgrads, and faculty on various “cool future” things.

              predictions of the likelihood of things geeks constantly dream about craters once you get past the very basics. I can only assume that fields that aren’t mine, and are in general vastly more complex, are at least as full of evidence of god hating us and not allowing us nice things.

              I remember reading some of yuddies writing about nanomagic and noticing that the word “sticktion” never showed up.

              • scruiser@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Judging by the way LLMs and generative AI has been used, even when we do get something vaguely like a realistic version of sci-fi fantasies, capitalism and people who can’t distinguish the limits of the real thing from the fantasy will manage to misuse it.

                • Soyweiser@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  This doesnt apply to everything, like VR and 3d printers were a sci-fi fantasy and now they are mundane economically viable but not revolutionary products.

                  Biohacking and nanomachines otoh dont seem to be viable and you hear nothing about those anymore. Only a little bit in the uncreative (and going on the experts unrealistic) ‘ai will create bioweapons’ critihype. No ‘It will turn people into cyberzombies’ (quake 2 was pretty good (that was aliens not AI but still)).

                • istewart@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  who in the hell would want programmable matter anymore, after they’ve seen what happened to plain ol’ computer programming as already practiced

                • schnoopy@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Piles of screaming grey goo and people being like “Why are you running away? can’t you see it’s my grandmother?”

                • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  What’s that XKCD that goes over the ways that capitalists would be ruthlessly exploiting all those “secrets they don’t want you to know” for incredible profits?

      • lurker@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re also incredibly horny about creating conscious digital slaves for some godforsaken reason

    • lurker@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah yes ‘only these two things are possible, dont consider any other outcome’ truly rational thought

      • BioMan@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        It’s just the fundamentalist version of our culture’s pathologies as a whole, which has a very hard time imagining anything other than endless progression or apocalypse, neither of which is real.

      • lurker@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Also, ‘it’ll be Good beyond our wildest imagination’ is just the vaguest thing ever. ‘yeah bro AI is gonna make everything super good. How? Why? uhhh i dont know it just will’