• Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 days ago

    You mean installing? How Google is going to handle restricting us from installing apps on our phone? Thats what it is. Sideloading doesn’t fucking exist.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          Thank you. I gave that community a subscribe because I want to use a Linux phone at some point in the future.

          The big thing I have to make sure of is accessibility as I am a low vision user who requires the use of screen magnification at the very minimum and a screen reader is preferred for text such as articles and websites.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          A Linux phone won’t help with the problem side loading stopping problem.

          Last time I used side loading was on a driving trip in Italy, I wanted the ZTA app so I could see where I wasn’t able to drive and plan routes that avoided ZTAs. A Linux phone wouldn’t have helped as no one would publish such an app for Linux unless the user population was in the tens of percentage

          ZTAs are the no cars allowed areas, usually the middle of towns

          • Turret3857@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 days ago

            Waydroid let’s you use Android apps on linux, and Jolla (I think thats the right company) has their own proprietary Android compatibility layer. Not to say the experience is perfect, I’d say its closer to how WINE was 10-15 years ago. But it wouldve been do-able, albeit probably with a bit of headache.

          • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            Id argue linux phones being used will fix the problem. People not publishing an app for linux isn’t because it’s impossible it’s because nobody is using it.

  • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    The strings mentioned are worrying. The developer verification requires an internet access - what if there’s no internet or the connection is spotty? Does that mean you can’t install the APK without Uncle Google having the internet first?

    Android already scares you away from installing APKs.

    A modern Android device does not simply let you install an APK without going through a lotta mental gymnastics. On a Xiaomi device with HyperOS, you have to turn the permission on for it and sit there for ten seconds to read their warnings before you can manually proceed. Each time you install something, there’s a chance Google Play will pop up to tell you the app does not support a modern Android version, and it will require your unlock or fingerprint to even continue. Not to mention some apps literally tell you Google Play is unsure of their security and offers you to send it so what I assume is their automated systems could give the APK file a look.

    If all these scare tactics didn’t stop you, there’s nothing more Google or the manufacturers could do without stripping even more of what made Android great in the first place.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Look up the word “Enshittification” in a dictionary and you’ll see the android logo right next to it

    • somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      There’s also some fucker named “Automatic Blocker” on (Samsung’s (?)) Android devices that is on by default, which prevents installation of APKs.

      • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        As in, no side loading at all on Sammy devices? I find that hard to believe. You mean more restrictions on installing just some but not all APKs, right? That’s still scummy either way if true.

          • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            I once read that uninstalling packages with ADB on Xiaomi phones would make it even more painful to unlock the bootloader. It’s probably just a one off half truth but even that made me be wary of just uninstalling things - but yeah this means whenever someone wants to sideload something on a Samsung they need to follow a tutorial at best, that’s blegh.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Exactly. Stop using sideloading. The correct term is “installing”.

      Google wants to prevent users from installing apps on their phones.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      See the same nonsense in the PC world with people talking about their “anticheat” when in what they really mean is “rootkit”

  • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    the biggest problem hasn’t yet emerged, let’s say Orange turd will use his power to force Goolag to restrict access to the Goolag account for any country or entity for any of his moronic reason.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Bigger would be leveraging Android System SafetyCore or iOS mediaanalysisd to stalk-spy on the contents of everyone’s phones on-demand for the State. The software is already there, and on both platforms have deep entitlements…