The spooks grow ever closer, and the abyss grows ever sandier.
Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
Searching google books for “reading slop”, this usage seems to be very sporadic (only 11 hits for 20th century publications), I’d think it was more just a case of independently coming up with the same shorthand rather than causal influence, whereas slop seems to have been used this way frequently enough on 4chan that it seems much more likely there was an actual chain of influence to later use on twitter and elsewhere, especially since a lot of other 4chan slang has later broken out in that way.
Or there was less occasion for a term for this particular kind of bad? Correlation, causation, etc.