NomNom@feddit.ukBanned to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agoTIL that last month, a rich man in New Jersey killed a pedestrian and left the scene. He was put on trial. The jury found him guilty. 15 minutes later, he walked out free. www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square96linkfedilinkarrow-up1700arrow-down117
arrow-up1683arrow-down1external-linkTIL that last month, a rich man in New Jersey killed a pedestrian and left the scene. He was put on trial. The jury found him guilty. 15 minutes later, he walked out free. www.nytimes.comNomNom@feddit.ukBanned to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square96linkfedilink
minus-squareSlashme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up60arrow-down1·2 months agoHoly shit, that article is tedious to read. Nowadays “good writing” seems to mean “jump around in the timeline a lot and write a whole lot of irrelevant backstory”.
minus-squareTexas_Hangover@lemmy.radiolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 months agoThe Tarantino Method, they call it.
minus-squarethisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 months agoThe writer needs AI to pad the words in an article, and the reader needs AI to sum up an article quickly.
minus-squareVegafjord demcon@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoMaybe it was an AI?
Holy shit, that article is tedious to read. Nowadays “good writing” seems to mean “jump around in the timeline a lot and write a whole lot of irrelevant backstory”.
The Tarantino Method, they call it.
The writer needs AI to pad the words in an article, and the reader needs AI to sum up an article quickly.
Maybe it was an AI?
deleted by creator