SorteKanin@feddit.dk to Rust@programming.dev · 29 days agoCasper's Blog – Why I forked randcasualhacks.netexternal-linkmessage-square3linkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10cross-posted to: lobsters@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkCasper's Blog – Why I forked randcasualhacks.netSorteKanin@feddit.dk to Rust@programming.dev · 29 days agomessage-square3linkfedilinkcross-posted to: lobsters@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dkOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 days agoIsn’t it pretty obvious? Fastrand is not cryptographically secure, urandom provides that option.
minus-squareBB_C@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 days ago Fastrand is not cryptographically secure That’s not relevant when it’s a question of interface. fastrand has a single Rng struct that drives everything else. Was the option to replace the implementation details of this struct explored? No idea.
Isn’t it pretty obvious? Fastrand is not cryptographically secure, urandom provides that option.
That’s not relevant when it’s a question of interface.
fastrandhas a singleRngstruct that drives everything else. Was the option to replace the implementation details of this struct explored? No idea.