It’s the top comment on all the pop science articles. Can it just officially be a rule? You are all much smarter than I, please help compile a list of known websites that publish explicitly low quality articles, with very little science basis to back up said claims, beyond an extremely shoddy study.

  • halfdane@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not that long here, but if it’s not feasible to automatically detect the slopper-sites, maybe a rule could be introduced that people can report on?

    This way the mod has an easier time identifying the things that are unwanted by the community.

    • Zoot@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      This was actually the solution I had in mind. Id be happy to report the articles, if there was an actual rule to point to.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’d go so far as to blacklist individual sites based on a threshold upvote on the top negative post (can be automated), and give a mechanism to undo it, poll perhaps, if people care enough they’ll protect. It will naturally tend to negative, but given 90%(+ these days) of everything is crap -Sturgeon’s law - it should work out.

    • Zoot@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      A list of the worst offenders would help significantly atleast.

      However, I did happen to notice this community only has 1 active mod, and they mod other communities as well, so maybe this one just needs some actual love and care.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You could file a feature request, or a pull request if you want to get a little deeper into it.

        • Zoot@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          Or i can just request that the science communities have rules? Like tf yall lol. I don’t want a new service, and I don’t want a new app. I’ve noticed a considerable amount of people also wish this was a rule, so can we focus on making this community better before giving up and going somewhere else?

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            I think you’re right, since it’s a lot of duplicated work if everyone has to do these filtering tasks for themselves, so blocking isn’t an ideal solution here.

          • Rimu@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            None of this community’s mods have been active in the last month. This community is effectively unmoderated so there’s no one to set the rules.

            If you’d like to moderate it, you could contact the lemmy.world admins and ask to be appointed. I bet a community like this would be almost no work to maintain as it’s not news or politics.

            • Zoot@reddthat.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Except the head mod is currently active so I would not be able to simply take it over. Thank you for the suggestions.