If it was clear I would have answered it. Why what? Which part of what i wrote were you questioning? We will never know because instead of writing a specific question you write “why?..” and then threw a fit like a toddler when I refused to try and read your mind.
Why should it read “Corrupt corporate government run by pedophiles decides it would be bad optics to jail hero who knocked out predator who was actively harming children”?
You say that like its completely reasonable for the system to be trying to jail a man for rescuing children from a predator. The original title frames this as if he did something wrong by knocking out the chomo exposing himself to children but then he was graciously sAvEd by the system.
The original title was inaccurate and its kinda worrying that you wernt able to pick up on that all on your own.
If it was clear I would have answered it. Why what? Which part of what i wrote were you questioning? We will never know because instead of writing a specific question you write “why?..” and then threw a fit like a toddler when I refused to try and read your mind.
Why should it read “Corrupt corporate government run by pedophiles decides it would be bad optics to jail hero who knocked out predator who was actively harming children”?
Accuracy
You say that as if it’s inaccurate to say “Dad who knocked out man exposing himself to kids spared jail”.
You say that like its completely reasonable for the system to be trying to jail a man for rescuing children from a predator. The original title frames this as if he did something wrong by knocking out the chomo exposing himself to children but then he was graciously sAvEd by the system.
The original title was inaccurate and its kinda worrying that you wernt able to pick up on that all on your own.
Nope. You’ve editorialized the story in your own head and are mad that the headline didn’t do the same, nor in the same way.
The title doesn’t provide the framing that you want, but that does not mean that it is inaccurate.
Nope what?
Yes, I refrained it to better align with reality. Both are forms of editorializing. You dont have a point.
deleted by creator