bstix@feddit.dk to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyz · 3 days ago"I negotiate my own wages"files.catbox.moeexternal-linkmessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1586arrow-down16
arrow-up1580arrow-down1external-link"I negotiate my own wages"files.catbox.moebstix@feddit.dk to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyz · 3 days agomessage-square46linkfedilink
minus-squareMirror Giraffe@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·2 days agoIs it even possible to lose without a king?
minus-squareDonkter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up38·2 days agoThis is why the revolution will never die.
minus-squareAlbbi@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoSome would say you’ve lost before you even began. But there is an interesting chess variant called horde where Black must capture all of White’s pieces to win.
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoYou can stalemate it if you have no valid moves, or lose via time. I think you can technically lose to the repeated moves rule too? But then again that’s applying tournament rules to this scenario so…
Is it even possible to lose without a king?
This is why the revolution will never die.
Some would say you’ve lost before you even began.
But there is an interesting chess variant called horde where Black must capture all of White’s pieces to win.
You can stalemate it if you have no valid moves, or lose via time. I think you can technically lose to the repeated moves rule too? But then again that’s applying tournament rules to this scenario so…