• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Okay, but now I want to see what the end state looks like for optimal (or near-optimal) play between both participants in this fucked-up chess variant.

    • bstix@feddit.dkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s pretty straight forward I think. Each side loses one piece every round. If white somehow runs out of pawns that can check the black king, or if the black king manages to get behind the pawns, white can still promote some of them and win.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wouldn’t promoted pawns join the other side? Like a manager getting a payrise

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What? In the bottom board, assuming white to move, any capture is a checkmate - black king cannot escape check, and cannot capture because the pawn is supported.

        White wins in 1 move.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s pretty clearly a win for white, unless black forces a stalemate. Those knights won’t last and that’s a fuckton of pawns, even ignoring promotion.

      It would be tricksy trying to get checkmate without promoting any, but one or two promotions is all it would take to make it a sinch.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It would be tricksy trying to get checkmate without promoting any

        So what you’re saying is, the strategy of e.g. Occupy Wall Street, avoiding creating leaders, made it less effective than it could’ve been.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not sure, I was just analyzing the chess board.

          Although I will say that decentralized movements may tend to shoot themselves in the foot by failing to coalesce around any solid leadership.

          There’s good ways to do leadership and bad ways to do leadership. A movement can be grassroots and decentralized while still having leaders.