Probably just a viral marketing, by a hated company that use not protected labor to get rich

  • protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Per the prosecution, the act itself wasn’t what made the case criminal, it was the pattern.

    Among the court’s findings:

    1,847 deliveries placed over 241 days.
    Each containing exactly one lemon.
    Lemons sourced from 247 different restaurants.
    She used 11 burner DoorDash accounts to continue.

    Delivery instructions varied:

    “Hand it to him directly”
    “He will know”
    “Tell him she remembers”

    14 arrived at exactly 11:47 p.m.
    One arrived during his job interview.
    One arrived at a hospital while he was visiting >his father.

    The defense argued the deliveries were “fruit and therefore non-threatening.”

    The judge did not agree.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Hand it to him directly”
      “He will know”
      “Tell him she remembers”

      Driver: Yeah, I’m not doing that.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I want to know the percentage of lemons that were not delivered correctly, as in to the wrong address.

        I have speculations but this is valuable data.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even a 0.5% error rate is 9 lemons to the wrong place, which would be confusing as hell to someone.