Humans can communicate various instructions to dogs without using actual words—simply by modulating the tone of their voice, a new study from ELTE University’s Department of Ethology shows. By repeating the nonsense syllable ‘bü’ in different intonations, humans successfully signaled “Yes,” “No,” “Here,” and “There” and, remarkably, dogs responded correctly, despite receiving no prior training. The findings reveal ancient acoustic codes, interpretable across species, that predate language itself. The study was published in Cognition.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

  • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    No, because there’s no “understanding” of language going on here. The dogs are responding to a trained stimulus. I could train a dog to sit when told to stand and they wouldn’t be confused at all because it isn’t the word itself they’re interpreting and responding to.

    ETA: Downvoters need to stop anthropomorphizing their animals. It’s not healthy for you or them.

    • voltaa@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I still would say the same could be said for people. If from birth I was told that stand means sit, and I was raised in that manner, my response to being told to stand would be to sit, language is overall a response to a trained stimulus. It’s a very complex and interwoven response to trained stimulus but I am not interpreting the word itself, I am responding to what I have been trained that the word means. When I learn a new word I don’t respond based on what it means without having it demonstrated or explained.