fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoWe got a skimmermander.xyzimagemessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down12
arrow-up1517arrow-down1imageWe got a skimmermander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square14linkfedilink
minus-squareWater_Melon_boy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoIm genuinely confused. Then why even cite those articles? Is there a hard rule for “You must cite this much articles” before publishing?
minus-squareHolla@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 days agoI think that has to do with this xkcd:
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoOften yes, also, you may genuinely have to review A LOT of articles to make your point, and at that point, reading them in whole alone is gonna take you a few weeks time.
Im genuinely confused. Then why even cite those articles? Is there a hard rule for “You must cite this much articles” before publishing?
I think that has to do with this xkcd:
Sounds Legit!
Sounds legit [1].
[1]
Often yes, also, you may genuinely have to review A LOT of articles to make your point, and at that point, reading them in whole alone is gonna take you a few weeks time.