Rimu@piefed.social to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoRsync author responds to online outrage about his usage of LLMsmedium.comexternal-linkmessage-square212linkfedilinkarrow-up1265arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: programming@beehaw.orglobsters@lemmy.bestiver.semain@0xdd.org.ru
arrow-up1257arrow-down1external-linkRsync author responds to online outrage about his usage of LLMsmedium.comRimu@piefed.social to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square212linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@beehaw.orglobsters@lemmy.bestiver.semain@0xdd.org.ru
Seems like he’s been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.
minus-squareKingGimpicus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 days agoOn the one hand, using a language learning model to interpret and modify a programs code language seems like a no brainer. On the other hand, we have mountains of evidence that suggest the technology hasn’t been perfected. Maybe, just maybe, a disclaimer is appropriate.
minus-squareBazoogle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·21 hours agoHe did have a disclaimer. It says it was co-authored by claude What you see in the commit history with co-authored by claude is the tip of the proverbial software engineering iceberg.
On the one hand, using a language learning model to interpret and modify a programs code language seems like a no brainer. On the other hand, we have mountains of evidence that suggest the technology hasn’t been perfected.
Maybe, just maybe, a disclaimer is appropriate.
He did have a disclaimer. It says it was co-authored by claude