Luk@jlai.luM to En panne de sens@jlai.luEnglish · 6 days agoWhen AI is more expensive than people, why replace the people?www.telegraph.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down12
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkWhen AI is more expensive than people, why replace the people?www.telegraph.co.ukLuk@jlai.luM to En panne de sens@jlai.luEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareAkasazh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoPeople are nasty, they get ill, get mad when you extort them and go on strikes. They want a fully automated money machine but don’t understand that the people they are sacking are the ones doing the buying.
minus-squareInucune@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days agoSee, the trick is to automate your workforce. Your customers come from the other guy’s workforce so you keep making money. AI can’t do your job, right?
People are nasty, they get ill, get mad when you extort them and go on strikes.
They want a fully automated money machine but don’t understand that the people they are sacking are the ones doing the buying.
See, the trick is to automate your workforce. Your customers come from the other guy’s workforce so you keep making money. AI can’t do your job, right?