Luk@jlai.luM to En panne de sens@jlai.luEnglish · 3 个月前When AI is more expensive than people, why replace the people?www.telegraph.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down12
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkWhen AI is more expensive than people, why replace the people?www.telegraph.co.ukLuk@jlai.luM to En panne de sens@jlai.luEnglish · 3 个月前message-square12linkfedilink
minus-squareAkasazh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前People are nasty, they get ill, get mad when you extort them and go on strikes. They want a fully automated money machine but don’t understand that the people they are sacking are the ones doing the buying.
minus-squareInucune@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 个月前See, the trick is to automate your workforce. Your customers come from the other guy’s workforce so you keep making money. AI can’t do your job, right?
minus-squaresiera@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·25 天前Yeah, they love money and hate other human that could take part of this money. But they forgot that they are human too.
People are nasty, they get ill, get mad when you extort them and go on strikes.
They want a fully automated money machine but don’t understand that the people they are sacking are the ones doing the buying.
See, the trick is to automate your workforce. Your customers come from the other guy’s workforce so you keep making money. AI can’t do your job, right?
Yeah, they love money and hate other human that could take part of this money. But they forgot that they are human too.