Andrew Cullen:

[…] if a human asks an AI agent to gather health statistics, and the agent hacks a government server to do so, the human could lack the deliberate intent required for a conviction. The AI agent, meanwhile, lacks the legal personhood to be charged, as well as human intentionality.

Current Australia laws effectively treat AI actions as if they are something that just happens to us – like a severe weather event. This shows a glaring loophole in our legal system that does not hold those who make, maintain and use these systems to account when something goes wrong.

  • Impronoucabl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Why not both? If the manufacturer doesn’t install a safety switch that allows a foreseeable harm to occur, I’d say they’re partially responsible too.