If you can get a tiger through the door, I don’t think anyone is going to argue with it.
Perhaps it’s cumulative. 200lbs worth of cats total.
Cat Cat
That’s my cat’s name…
Monthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?
I don’t think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other.
Like, over time it’s more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two.
But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months.
So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.
So a pet should have a deposit or added rent but not a child? Or a second tenant? Is none of this the point of an overall damage deposit
Slippery fuckin slope.
landlord can’t legally charge more for children
Hmm I wonder why, maybe because they tried and people were sensible enough to push back.
deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet
the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond
