• misk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It decreased cannabis usage, no? A measure doesn’t have to be 100% effective to be worth doing. That’s an argument an antivaxxer would make.

    Also, it’s easy to go a couple of days without weed even when you’re heavily addicted. Now do that with nicotine.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      No…no it didn’t. Prohibition has never worked. All it does is create black markets and violence that follows.

      See war on drugs in the USA

      See prohibition of alcohol in the USA.

      • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Using USA as a representative of the world is delusional.

        • Bike lane failed in US, it didnt in Europe, it took over cars.
        • EV failed in US, didn’t everywhere else
        • Gun control worked everywhere else, not in USA.
        • Health
        • Education
        • Democracy
        • and so on…

        Seems like a you problem

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Using USA as a representative of the world is delusional.

          Assuming that people are magically different is delusional.

          • Bike lane failed in US, it didnt in Europe, it took over cars.

          The USA is massive… literally a good chunk of the Western Europe fits into Texas.

          • EV failed in US, didn’t everywhere else

          Uhh what? We have EVs here, trump is trying his best to snuff them out but that’s not happening.

          • Gun control worked everywhere else, not in USA.

          Australia…had forced buyback in the 90s after the port shooting…60% turn in rate, 1mil owned arms by civs…today 3+Mil firearms owned by citizens in Australia…so did it really work? Or did society get less violent because of the education and safety nets that Australia has?

          • Health

          Yea…and that’s not a ban?

          • Education

          This is not just a USA problem. Kids are getting dumber everywhere because of tech.

          • Democracy

          ???

          Seems like a you problem

          Seems more like you’re just projecting…

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not the point I know but:

            Australia…had forced buyback in the 90s after the port shooting…60% turn in rate, 1mil owned arms by civs…today 3+Mil firearms owned by citizens in Australia…so did it really work? Or did society get less violent because of the education and safety nets that Australia has?

            No the buyback wasn’t actually that effective as you noted, crime was already declining before the ban and as you noted number of guns increased since. Similarly in the US gun ownership (both % of gun owners and # of guns) have increased and violent crime of all kinds have decreased in the US in the same time. I “blame” surveillance states and probably stuff like taking the lead out of gas, personally. Also the same style buyback in the US would be monumentally expensive, not effective because of resistance, and not effective because of lack of social safety nets (listed separately on purpose.)