CPC saying they want to collaborate while they send another MP to bend the knee at one of Trumps prayer breakfasts on the taxpayer dime.

I predict PP said something like this… “You better give Trump what he wants because we’ve spent the last year lobbying the Trump regime, convincing them that Canada would be an easier target than Greenland, and we will support him if he tries to replace you.”

The CPC have been clear, they see the problem of US aggression as an LPC issue. The CPC has always advocated for giving Trump everything he wants, just have to remember with all of their statements, they come from a place that believes Trumps rhetoric that Canada would be a greater, stronger country through submission to his demands.

I want you to be wrong, but it looks like conservative politicians in Canada have been pushing for him to focus on Canada instead of Greenland. Alberta makes us the softest target in the Western Hemisphere with the UCP and CPC ready to legitimize his actions.

Any article about foreign interference that fails to mention the fact the leader of the opposition still refuses to get his security clearance isn’t worth the time of day.

Yes foreign interference is a problem, but there is clearly a group in Ottawa obstructing any attempt to tackle the issue, which has been attempted only to be obstructed and politicized by the CPC. This absolutely needs to be addressed so the house can move forward on this issue in collaboration with all the parties.

This should also include making the parties themselves have rules to help prevent future interference, rules that are not just unwritten, but laid out in clear legal language because we can’t trust all the parties to follow decorum anymore.

It’s getting old conservative outlets pointing to China when the American administration is literally helping fund a separatist movement in Alberta run by the most corrupt morons in the province, actions the CPC refuses to condemn. BUT LOOK AT CHINA!!!

From a business standpoint it makes perfect sense, any money the government invests into preventative medicine now, is money they miss out on from treating the symptoms once healthcare is privatized.

I suspect it’s because he can get a foot in the door through Alberta, and he has the official opposition in his pocket. If he moves on Canada compared to other countries he’s threatened(?), there are people in positions of power willing to legitimize his actions. I’m not sure if the same can be said about Greenland, Columbia, or Mexico.

Again?

Free speech to the CPC = Freedom for me to spout whatever I want without anyone being able to disagree with me, and freedom for me to shut down your speech when it conflicts with my opinion.

The words free and speech are both in there, just not in the way you’d expect. Thats the beauty of marketing with tribal based double think, it’s meaning to them is different based on who is saying it.

This is normal for the CPC same thing happened in London Ontario during the last election.

If CPC supporters are contacting her saying this isn’t what this party represents, then they haven’t been paying any attention to what their party has been saying over the last decade. Not that it’s surprising at all, the Reform wing of the CPC simply erased what was left of PC influence in the party over the pandemic. Which is how they’ve been trying to market extreme ideas to moderate voters, by just lying to them.

I think that’s the core here, it’s clearly laid out in the judges decision that the problem wasn’t the government using excessive force, it’s that the EA isn’t really meant to deal with this level of incompetence. Its purpose is to deal with real national security threats, and nothing the convoy did was beyond the scope of the local police, they just chose not to act, and the only mechanisms to hold anyone accountable within the police are operated by the police.

Partisanship within Canadian police departments is a serious issue, and while this ruling should be a wake up call, it won’t be heard.

Unfortunately partisan actors will paint the decision as “Trudeau is a tyrant” in conservative media regardless of the reality.

Canada and the rest of NATO are on a collision course towards conflict with Russia AND the United States.

Both nations are currently posturing to attack the EU, from two different sides, and I don’t think thats a coincidence.

I think we’ll find being at war with the US, also means being at war with Russia, because it’s highly probable based on global posturing that they both see the EU as a threat. Specifically the US tech industry is teaming up with the far right, the far right want the EU to be more Christian nationalist, and the tech industry wants a more friendly regulatory environment in this very large consumer market. Russia wants the same thing but the regulatory environment it for Russian gas companies rather than tech companies.