

Omg that was hilarious, thank you.
Decentralise everything!


Omg that was hilarious, thank you.


Its not like its easy for the people to stop. Person À and Person B are both involved in a scuffle. Cop or whatever tells them to stop. If A stops but B doesn’t stop, A just gets his ass kicked as a best case, or might get killed as a worst case if B has a weapon, for example. And vice versa. They have to both stop at the same time, which means expecting coordination between them which is ridiculous.
There’s also the very real possibility that the homeowner did stop and freeze, but person B kept attacking, and so the cop still shot at them since they didn’t both stop.
It’s ridiculous that this needs explaining to a supposedly trained cop.


It baffles me that it is even possible to summarily strip citizenship like that.
Like, it would be a lot more reasonable if people born on US soil, only in the future, no longer get citizenship.
But how can it be legal to remove citizenship by redefining the law, and then retroactively stripping people of it that no longer fit the definition? Like, isn’t this the same as making a law in 2026 banning smoking, and then going back and jailing anyone who has ever smoked?
It is surprising and Im sure it reduced the performance, but plastic still conducts heat and sounds like it was a thermoplastic and it didn’t melt.


LOL. Timestamp?


She, and all the department figureheads, are experts at making us waste our time. Bondi is really not worth it to listen to - complete waste of time. But she spouts bullshit that’s obvious bullshit but takes quite a bit of explaining to show why it’s bullshit. That slows the resistance down.


Pretty romantic


If it can exacerbate psychotic tendencies, then it can cause psychosis. Claiming that increasing or exacerbating tendencies doesn’t necessarily mean it is causing it, is an interesting area for debate, but it’s just semantics. Of course, I am also arguing semantics here.
I think ehat is more interesting psychologically to ask is just how much does AI exacerbate psychotic tendencies, or if AI-induced psychosis is temporary (like drug-induced psychosis often is), or is permanent. I dont know anything about this topic but I hope to hear from someone who does.


Such unhingedness:
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday threatened to bar the new $4.7 billion bridge …
[as reasons] Trump cited Canada’s ownership of the Gordie Howe International Bridge, …
The bridge was financed by Canada because the U.S. refused to pay for it and is set to open in the coming months.


Yeah probably, but I think consumer hacks slash microchip companies might buy them and retrofit them to be GPU’s. If most of them are not just sold to the public, I suspect that nVIDIA et al might buy them back from business customers, and then modify them to re-sell to consumers.


Perhaps its a lot to ask, but could you share some of the people profiles?
Rookie mistake. You sleep with your shoes on.
Not relevant to whats being discussed. I wish rather than delete the comment, mods are able to flag it as AI and users can choose whether to see AI posts or not.
Random thought.
It’s satire from Elijah Manley.