Most libs want to provide free healthcare and fight climate change. Both items would reduce harm and suffering and genocide* domestically and abroad.
*inequities health outcomes are tantamount to genocide; climate change also has genocidal effects
Lol. Lmao. 2 years with the bare minimum to be a majority with 96% of the caucus being for it and 4% (2 people) being the reason it didnt happen, is plenty of chances?
You need to go back 15 years to an entirely different political climate to find a better trifecta, at which time we got decent climate legislation and the ACA which, again, 80% of elected dems wanted to better than the ACA. Before that, was 2 years under clinton which was last century.
Hang on there, because with some issues, they do want to reduce the torment below current levels, and i think that should matter
Citation needed.
Most libs want to provide free healthcare and fight climate change. Both items would reduce harm and suffering and genocide* domestically and abroad. *inequities health outcomes are tantamount to genocide; climate change also has genocidal effects
No, they say they do. If they wanted to, they’ve had plenty of chances.
Lol. Lmao. 2 years with the bare minimum to be a majority with 96% of the caucus being for it and 4% (2 people) being the reason it didnt happen, is plenty of chances?
Abdolutely, yes, only there.
You need to go back 15 years to an entirely different political climate to find a better trifecta, at which time we got decent climate legislation and the ACA which, again, 80% of elected dems wanted to better than the ACA. Before that, was 2 years under clinton which was last century.