Lmao.

For anyone who actually cares, Wolverine the comic book character was first written in 1974. This frog was first discovered in the early 1900s, but it’s skin-piecing bone claw mechanism wasn’t discovered until 2008. It’s nickname of “wolverine frog” is 100%, definitively, objectively, named after the comic book character, and not the other way around.

So you’re trying to say that the frog may have been named after the comic book character then?

Do you think it’s been called “wolverine frog” since the moment it existed?

That might also be part of the satire

Rip all those people living in the houses directly between a soccer stadium and F1 track

Do you think American cheese is the only cheese you’re able to find in America

Alright alright alright

A lot of parts of Lemmy have a sexism problem

There’s layers to the meme. It’s also about how junior engineers are often overworked and underpaid.

Ok I feel like that’s a fair distinction, and in this case, makes it clear where the blame should be pointed: the race organizers. If it’s the case that the person in the first position isn’t allowed to draft, the race organizers should set the start times to where that isn’t a possibility.

In a combined race, even the fastest women have something to draft behind that rides faster than they normally could: a man.

Ok, but every single race has people drafting behind others that are faster than them, right? Why is it a-ok for a slow man to draft behind a fast man, but it’s cheating for a woman to draft behind a man?

He’s great at playing muscle headed idiots though

That’s just a repurposed West Virginia/Kentucky joke

When are you guys gonna come up with new Ohio jokes, these ones were old two decades ago

To be fair, those bullet points are pretty standard security best practices that any software company should be following.

But like, at the same time, even if AI companies were doing those best practices, I still wouldn’t let their products loose on production systems.

We have computing power in our pockets a million times more powerful than we used to send man to the moon, why do you think we’ll never have enough power?

Not the person you replied to, but I have thoughts on this point in particular:

1. Consumer devices have started to slow down their performance improvements because we’re bumping up against the limits of physics
2. People/corporations with way more money than the average consumer will always be able to run something orders of magnitude more powerful. Any advances that improve things for the average consumer will improve things for rich people/corporations even more.
3. Training an LLM isn’t really even about compute speed, it’s about access to good training material. The average consumer can’t afford to buy (or pirate) every book in existence like a rich person/corporation can. An average person doesn’t have the ability or time to curate their own training data, but rich people/corporations do.

I’m in favor of AI being developed further as long as there is economic interest in it

Yeah fuck the planet, children, women, students, teachers, artists, and the myriad of other people currently actively harmed by AI, won’t someone think of the economy?

You must be a professional at missing the point, because you’re very good at it

Do you generalize everything this way, or is it just dogs that you’re moronic about

Start with just sharing your feelings with the bros and go from there