stephen01king

Having a different opinion than the Chinese people is neither racism nor removing agency from the Chinese people. Where did this logic even come from? It’s not like he’s criticising the Chinese race by disagreeing with their opinion. Me not liking your favourite food does not relate to your race nor your agency to like the food, so why should it for opinions on goverments?

Mantises even eat their own partners. How safe do you think being friends with them will be?

Also, why is the same lines repeated?

I assume it’s to hammer in the point. That’s usually why lines are repeated in literature and poems.

I expect them not to focus on AR as the biggest usecase for it is for virtual monitor in a real life environment and not gaming. Maybe the give us a colour camera add-on, but I doubt it’ll be their focus from the get-go.

The Chinese government is a race?

Valve is still not making one that can do AR, so we’re still stuck with either Meta or Pico for that use case.

You’re right, I didn’t refute. Wrong word used there. i was asking for receipt, because saying .world is not a receipt. If I accused you of doing the same thing the guy accused these people of, would you accept if the only receipt I used is the fact that you’re a .world account?

I never said they didn’t do the thing they’re being accused of, I just have a better standard of proof than what server they started their Lemmy account in. Turns out you didn’t, so I am quite disappointed in you.

As was predicted. “One day, when it’s safe, when there’s no personal downside to calling a thing what it is, when it’s too late to hold anyone accountable, everyone will have always been against this.” - Omar El Akkad

But it’s not too late. The people who are responsible in your assertion are still alive and still doubling down on the genocide, so by what metric are you measuring the people here who are already acting against genocide before your prediction has come true? It doesn’t seem like you thought your logic through.

Obviously they meant the Steam Controller, not the Steam Controller.

So that’s where Israel learnt their war crimes from.

Isn’t that what they tell Democrats to do every time?

I don’t understand why you’re getting down voted. Can one of the down voters at least explain why?

Did you forget what the claim I refuted was? That it was the exact people seething about Clinton now are the same ones defending her unquestionably back then.

Is your assertion that the people who would party if the genocide runs to completion back then are the same ones seething at Hillary now for still supporting the genocide? Because that doesn’t make logical sense, does it?

That’s not an answer. Plenty of people on .world don’t support establishment democrats. Both you and the top commenter are .world accounts, after all.

How did you know? Do you have the receipts for your claim? It’s also possible that these people you’re referring to have gained more information that made them change their mind since then. So is it that you think they should’ve doubled down on their choice back then, instead?

A broke one.

Could even be the astronaut with a gun.

You look at country that actually have balls and they don’t need a rallying point to go out and do something. They all just do it and it becomes a group action by the very fact that most of them don’t wait around for a signal.

The irony here is you calling people bots for asking why Americans haven’t done something yet, but here you are waiting for people to tell you what to do before you do something, you know, like a bot does.

Tone is not something that everyone can pick up equally. If you have an option to make it clearer, why are you people so determined that it mustn’t be changed?

Yep, all we want are more options other than driving. A good cycling and pedestrian infrastructure even helps in making sure they’re out of the road and not in the way of cars, something I’m sure a lot of car-centric people would actually be happy about. It’s a net positive for everyone.

Well, first of all, you could read usernames. That would be helpful to determine what points you’re going to argue against and what the appropriate response would be.

Second, nobody is asserting that the US never considered public transport, we were only addressing the actual decision of the US in general, which IS very much focused on electric cars to the detriment of progress on much saner public transport projects. The Vegas Loop and similar projects immediately come to mind.

The laws that gets in the way of public transport projects are a result of the US’s obsession with car-centrism and capitalism. Instead of thinking of long term solutions, they’d rather clutch to a band aid solution to keep their status quo.

And discussions about public transport is not focussed solely on trains. On the contrary, the most depressing thing about the us car-centrism is the inability to do short trips without needing a car. Pedestrian and cycling infrastructure are pretty cheap relative to building high speed train networks or even inner city metros, yet the US even struggle with that.

The source of the problem are the people themselves who have been deluded into thinking they need to force everyone to use a car simply because they don’t want to use public transportation, which is an absurd thought process. The focus on electric cars will only continue this brainwashing, not fix it, so it is a net negative in the long run.