• A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Seriously, why merge at all? I guess I’m being naive, but would WB really go under otherwise? Can’t we just have a significant number of competing companies?

    • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not really. These brands are hollow shells of former glory. Their output is cynical trash designed by committees to extract maximum revenue, soulless and worthless. They can all burn to the ground for all I care.

  • Foni@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Do all the options really involve greater market concentration? Are there no outside companies interested in diversifying?

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      No one really wants (to simplify) aging cable channels, HBO, and Harry Potter unless they can leverage them somehow.

      Netflix can fold them into their streaming and presumably cut a lot of redundancy.

      Comcast already owns the Harry Potter parks and cable channels. They very much need the prestige of the HBO brand.

      Paramount is freshly flush with cash and presumably just trying to just grab market share to stand a fighting chance.

      But… outside companies can’t really use it as well. What would (for example) Sony do with all that?

    • xyzzy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There are lots of examples of companies declining to consolidate and going on to succeed, and lots of examples where companies consolidate and it’s a disaster (two prior examples for WB alone!). But only one yields a $500 million payout for the CEO.